{"id":727,"date":"2012-01-24T18:47:34","date_gmt":"2012-01-24T18:47:34","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/tankhughes.com\/?p=727"},"modified":"2012-06-15T16:44:35","modified_gmt":"2012-06-15T15:44:35","slug":"a-wimman-needs-a-man-like-a-ghoti-needs-a-bicycle","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/tankhughes.com\/?p=727","title":{"rendered":"A Wimman Needs a Man like a Ghoti Needs a Bicycle"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Does that title make you as happy as it makes me? Probably not, but let&#8217;s see if I can change that.<\/p>\n<a href=\"https:\/\/tankhughes.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/01\/mai.jpeg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-729\" title=\"mai\" src=\"https:\/\/tankhughes.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/01\/mai-300x300.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"300\" srcset=\"https:\/\/tankhughes.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/01\/mai-300x300.jpg 300w, https:\/\/tankhughes.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/01\/mai-150x150.jpg 150w, https:\/\/tankhughes.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/01\/mai.jpeg 472w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a> Linguistics Llama Knows What I&#8217;m Saying\n<p><strong>Part 1<\/strong>: <em>Ghoti<\/em> is a satirical spelling of f<em>ish <\/em>[f\u026a\u0283]. It is often attributed to George Bernard Shaw, but he doesn&#8217;t take credit for it. <em>Ghoti<\/em>\u00a0is used to mock spelling inconsistencies in English and advocate reform. (There&#8217;s a clever bunch who even say <em>ghoti<\/em> should be <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Ghoti#Silent_ghoti\">silent<\/a>). I don&#8217;t deny it, English spelling <em>is<\/em> very irregular. It&#8217;s a Germanic language at heart, but with massive word-borrowing from French and Latin, and PTSD from the GVS (Great Vowel Shift). This is the phonetic thinking behind ghoti:<\/p>\n<p>GH is\u00a0[f] as in TOUGH<br \/>\nO is [\u026a]\u00a0as in WOMEN<br \/>\nTI is [\u0283]\u00a0as in NATION<\/p>\n<p>Obviously, the &#8216;sh&#8217; in\u00a0<em>nation<\/em>\u00a0needs a larger environment to have its unusual pronunciation, as in g<em>hotion.\u00a0<\/em>\u00a0Likewise, &#8216;gh&#8217; in\u00a0<em>tough<\/em>\u00a0needs to be syllable-final, as in <em>roughot<\/em><em>ion<\/em>\u00a0[r\u028cf\u026a\u0283\u0259n]. That works, I guess, except for that tricky vowel. That silly vowel that makes people say <a href=\"http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=GlkoQ4bUE5k\">WOAH-man<\/a>.<!--more--><\/p>\n<p><strong>Part 2:<\/strong>\u00a0Today, morphology homework (&lt;3) had me reading some chapters about the history of English. Oh my, what a happy girl. Spelling changes in English have happened accidentally and on purpose, and both kinds of change contribute to confusion about spelling and pronunciation in the modern age. <em>(Travel to the near future and read my article about DAR and thorn for another example. ) <\/em><\/p>\n<p><em><\/em>One such source of change are <em>minims<\/em>. &#8220;What are minims?!&#8221; you ask, impatiently. Well, back in the day of illuminated texts, scribes used to write in very elaborate script, and they used sequences of vertical downstrokes to signify 6 letters: <em>i<\/em>, <em>m<\/em>, <em>n<\/em>, <em>u<\/em>, <em>v<\/em>, and <em>w<\/em>. These letters were indistinguishable from each other. This means that a word like <em>man<\/em> would sort of look like this: \u026a\u026a\u026aa\u026a\u026a, and would look the same as wav, inan, \u00a0maii, viau. For <em>man<\/em> this is not a problem, because it&#8217;s a common word with no potential homographs, but for several words it was. In those cases, the vowel, <em>i<\/em> or <em>u<\/em>, was changed to an <em>o<\/em> for legibility&#8217;s sake. Some were never changed back. Originally <em>come<\/em> was <em>cume<\/em>, <em>love<\/em> was <em>luve<\/em>, and <em>woman<\/em>, was <em>wimman<\/em>. They originals would have looked like this c\u026a\u026a\u026a\u026a\u026ae, l\u026a\u026a\u026a\u026ae, and\u00a0\u026a\u026a\u026a\u026a\u026a\u026a\u026a\u026a\u026a\u026aa\u026a\u026a.<\/p>\n<a href=\"https:\/\/tankhughes.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/01\/minims.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-728\" title=\"minims\" src=\"https:\/\/tankhughes.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/01\/minims-300x191.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"191\" srcset=\"https:\/\/tankhughes.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/01\/minims-300x191.jpg 300w, https:\/\/tankhughes.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/01\/minims.jpg 483w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a> Minims in an Excerpt of Canterbury Tales\n<p>Even though an <em>o<\/em> was used in manuscripts, it was understood that the pronunciation was still the same. At some point, from second-language learners or a lag in education, this knowledge was forgotten or lost or ignored. So! The <em>o&#8217;s\u00a0<\/em>in <em>woman<\/em> and\u00a0<em>women<\/em>\u00a0are placeholders for <em>i<\/em>. \u00a0The first vowel in <em>woman<\/em> [w\u028am\u0259n] became rounded from the [w]. The plural of <em>wimman<\/em> was <em>wimmen<\/em>, which\u00a0was influenced by its second vowel and retained the original sound as [w\u026am\u026an] That&#8217;s why it&#8217;s written that way. Yeah! Mystery solved!<\/p>\n<p><strong>Part 3<\/strong>: Gloria Steinem is often quoted as saying &#8220;A woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle.&#8221; Very often, I confuse Gloria Steinem with Gertrude Stein in my head. Influential ladies with similar names.\u00a0Anyway, apparently Gloria didn&#8217;t originate the quote, Irina Dunn did. (<em>100% failure of common knowledge about quotes today, team<\/em>)<em>.<\/em> Anyway, it&#8217;s a great quote, I love it, and it conveniently combines this fact that I just learned about <em>minims<\/em> and the persnickety old standby,\u00a0<em>ghoti<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;A wimman needs a man like a ghoti needs a bicycle.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Happy half-birthday to me.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Does that title make you as happy as it makes me? Probably not, but let&#8217;s see if I can change that. Part 1: Ghoti is a satirical spelling of fish [f\u026a\u0283]. It is often attributed to George Bernard Shaw, but he doesn&#8217;t take credit for it. Ghoti\u00a0is used to mock spelling inconsistencies in English and [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[154,572,402,253,486,109,268,3],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-727","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-best-post-ever","category-career","category-english","category-etymology","category-history-of-language","category-insignificant-linguistics-mystery","category-ipa","category-words"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/tankhughes.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/727","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/tankhughes.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/tankhughes.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tankhughes.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tankhughes.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=727"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/tankhughes.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/727\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/tankhughes.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=727"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tankhughes.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=727"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tankhughes.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=727"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}